On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:09:16 EDT, Phillip Susi said:
> No recursion is needed because only one acl exists, so that is the only
> one you need to update. At least on disk. Any cached acls in memory of
> descendant objects would need updated, but the number of those should be
> relatively small.
On my laptop (this is a *laptop*, mind you):
% df -i /home
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-home
655360 532361 122999 82% /home
What happens if I do a 'mv /home /home1'? Looks like more than a "relatively
small" number. A cold-cache 'find' takes a few minutes to wade through it all,
so any solutions you come up with should beware of locking issues...
Attachment:
pgpjD7S9t583B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- From: Phillip Susi <[email protected]>
- Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- References:
- Thinking outside the box on file systems
- From: Marc Perkel <[email protected]>
- Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- From: alan <[email protected]>
- Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- From: Michael Tharp <[email protected]>
- Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- From: Phillip Susi <[email protected]>
- Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- From: Phillip Susi <[email protected]>
- Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- From: Phillip Susi <[email protected]>
- Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- From: Phillip Susi <[email protected]>
- Thinking outside the box on file systems
- Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH 1/1] cciss: fix error reporting for SG_IO
- Next by Date: Re: [linux-pm] Re: Storing Maintainers info around the kernel tree
- Previous by thread: Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- Next by thread: Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
- Index(es):
 |