Re: [PATCH 001 of 5] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge.

On Thu, Aug 16 2007, NeilBrown wrote:
> 
> ll_merge_requests_fn can update bi_hw_*_size in one case where we end
> up not merging.  This is wrong.

This looks good, obviously. Applied.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 000 of 5] Introductory patches for bio refactor.
  - From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 001 of 5] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge.
  - From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: RE: drivers/net/tokenring/3c359.c
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 002 of 5] Replace bio_data with blk_rq_data
Previous by thread: [PATCH 001 of 5] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge.
Next by thread: [PATCH 002 of 5] Replace bio_data with blk_rq_data
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]