On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 11:45:20AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 07:19:57PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > > Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote: > > > > > Let's turn this around. Can you give a single example where > > > the volatile semantics is needed in a legitimate way? > > > > Accessing H/W registers? But apart from that... > > Communicating between process context and interrupt/NMI handlers using > per-CPU variables. Remeber we're talking about atomic_read/atomic_set. Please cite the actual file/function name you have in mind. Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- References:
- [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
- [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- Prev by Date: Re: do_coredump and O_NOFOLLOW
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/2] i386: use asm() like the other atomic operations already do.
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- Index(es):
![]() |