Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures

On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:13:12PM -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
>
> Part of the motivation here is to fix heisenbugs.  If I knew where they 

By the same token we should probably disable optimisations
altogether since that too can create heisenbugs.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
  - From: Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
  - From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
  - From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
  - From: Chris Snook <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: RE: [patch 2/4] scsi: expose AN support to user space
Next by Date: Re: do_coredump and O_NOFOLLOW
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]