Re: Regression in 2.6.23-rc2-mm2, mounting cpusets causes a hang

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:

> > So its always true for node 0. The "bit" is set.
> 
> The issue is with the N_*_MEMORY masks.  They don't get initialized
> properly because node_set_state() is a no-op if !NUMA.  So, where we
> look for intersections with or where we AND with the N_*_MEMORY masks we
> get the empty set.

That is intentional. Memory is always present if you are on !NUMA. You can 
simply use a default nodemask where only node 0 is set. That is what the 
fallback provides. Maybe it does not provide the right thing for cpusets?

> > We are trying to get cpusets to work with !NUMA?
> 
> Well, yes.  In Serge's case, he's trying to use cpusets with !NUMA.
> He'll have to comment on the reasons for that.  Looking at all of the
> #ifdefs and init/Kconfig, CPUSET does not depend on NUMA--only SMP and
> CONTAINERS [altho' methinks CPUSET should select CONTAINERS rather than
> depend on it...].  So, you can use cpusets to partition of cpus in
> non-NUMA configs.

Looks like we need to fix cpuset nodemasks for the !NUMA case then?
It cannot expect to find valid nodemasks if !NUMA.

> In the more general case, tho', I'm looking at all uses of the
> node_online_map and for_each_online_node, for instances where they
> should be replaced with one of the *_MEMORY masks.  IMO, generic code
> that is compiled independent of any CONFIG option, like NUMA,  should
> just work, independent of the config.  Currently, as Serge has shown,

AFAIK this works except for cpusets.

> this is not the case.  So, I think we should fix the *_MEMORY maps to be
> correctly populated in both the NUMA and !NUMA cases.  A couple of
> options:

There is no point in having a variable if you know the results because of 
!NUMA. That is the way nodemask.h has always operated.

> Thoughts?

Lets get either rid of the definitions for the nodemasks in the !NUMA 
case or fix their contents to have the right constant value expected in 
cpusets.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux