Re: [PATCH 6/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on frv

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well if there is only one memory location involved, then smp_rmb() isn't
going to really do anything anyway, so it would be incorrect to use it.

rmb() orders *any* two reads; that includes two reads from the same
location.

Consider that smp_rmb basically will do anything from flushing the
pipeline to invalidating loads speculatively executed out of order. AFAIK it will not control the visibility of stores coming from other CPUs (that
is up to the cache coherency).

The writer side should typically use wmb() whenever the reader side
uses rmb(), sure.


Segher

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux