Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:28 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote:
> > Group, Ingo Molnar, etc,
> >
> > Why does the rt sched_class contain fewer elements than fair?
> > missing is the RT for .task_new.
>
> No class specific initialization needs to be done for RT tasks.
>
> -Mike
Mike, et al,
one time: I was told that this group likes bottom posts.
The logic of class independent code calling class
scheduling dependent code, assumes that all functions
are in ALL the class dependent sections.
Minimally, if I agree with your above statement, I would assume
that the function should still exist as a null type function. However,
in reality, alot of RT class specific init is done. Just currently
none of it is done in this non-existant function.
Mitchell Erblich
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
