Re: [patch 1/2] i386: use asm() like the other atomic operations already do.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Herbert Xu wrote:
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
My config with march=pentium-m and gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2):
  text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
3434150  249176  176128 3859454  3ae3fe atomic_normal/vmlinux
3435308  249176  176128 3860612  3ae884 atomic_inlineasm/vmlinux
What is the difference between atomic_normal and atomic_inlineasm?

The inline asm stops certain optimisations from occuring.

I'm still unconvinced why we need this because nobody has
brought up any examples of kernel code that legitimately
need this.

There's plenty of kernel code that *wants* this though. If we can reduce the need for register-clobbering barriers, shrink our binaries, shrink our code, improve performance, and avoid heisenbugs, I think it's a win, whether or not we *need* it.

	-- Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux