Re: [PATCH 00/16] Permit filesystem local caching [try #3]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- Stephen Smalley <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 08:53 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > --- David Howells <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Casey Schaufler <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > With Smack you can leave the label alone, raise CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE,
> > > > do your business of setting the label correctly, and then drop
> > > > the capability. No new hooks required.
> > > 
> > > That sounds like a contradiction.  How can you both leave it alone and
> set
> > > it?
> > 
> > Whoops, sorry. You leave the process label alone and explicitly
> > set the file label using the xattr interfaces.
> 
> xattr interfaces don't help with the initial labeling of the file when
> it is created.

That's true. The deamon needs to run with an appropriate label.
I don't believe that this is situation with a really simple solution
because the activity being performed is unusual. 
 
> -- 
> Stephen Smalley
> National Security Agency
> 
> 
> --
> This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
> If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to [email protected] with
> the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
> 
> 
> 


Casey Schaufler
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux