Hello,
> It is possible to panic the box by a race condition that exists in the
> journalling code where we do not take the j_revoke_lock when traversing the
> journal's revoked record list. This patch has been tested and we haven't seen
> the issue yet, its a rather straightforward and correct (at least I think so :)
> fix. Thank you,
In principle, the patch looks fine. The only thing I'm wondering about
is how that panic can happen... Journal write_revoke_records() is called
from journal_commit_transaction() when revoke table for the committing
transaction shouldn't see any further changes. So maybe the patch is
masking a different problem.
Do you have a way of reproducing the problem? Any stack trace
available?
Honza
--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
