> So even with Alan's hypervisor support the whole thing would be still
> quite holey. The argument of raising the bar also doesn't seem very
Its materially harder, especially with the hypervisor.
> convincing to me, because attackers reuse code too and it's enough
> when someone publishes such code once, then they can cut'n'paste
> it into any exploits forever.
Then you fix the specific case and the game continues.
> In general the .data protection is only considered a debugging
> feature. I don't know why Fedora enables it in their production
> kernels.
That would be because we think you are wrong 8)
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
