On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> > Only if you find another way to fix the bug that is addressed there.
>
> Does the appended version fix both the issues? Name alien in cache_free_alien
> is confusing, as the function does two things. free through alien caches
> or direct remote free..
Yes calling cache_free_alien is not necessary if you just have a single
node. All memory is node local in that case.
I do not think that cache_free_alien is confusing since the name refers to
the function freeing an alien object. That alien object can be freed to an
alien cache or directly to a remote slab.
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
