Am Dienstag 14 August 2007 schrieb Greg KH: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:13:34PM +0200, Prakash Punnoor wrote: > > Am Dienstag 14 August 2007 schrieb Greg KH: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.22.3 release. > > > > You missed this one: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/296 > > > > The buggy patch was introduced in 2.6.22.2, so it wouldn't be bad to fix > > in .3... > > I asked for clarification about that patch, if it is really needed and > matters, yet did not recieve any response yet. Well, I can't speak for the author, but I at least would find it disturbing if some random values would be written into random registers of my hardware, when they were meant for a different hardware... -- (°= =°) //\ Prakash Punnoor /\\ V_/ \_V
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- References:
- [patch 00/12] 2.6.22-stable review
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/12] 2.6.22-stable review
- From: Prakash Punnoor <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/12] 2.6.22-stable review
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- [patch 00/12] 2.6.22-stable review
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on frv
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc3 - CONFIG_VMI broken
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/12] 2.6.22-stable review
- Next by thread: [PATCH] sh: replace mutexes which are used in SH-4 user page copy/clear functions in 2.6.22.X
- Index(es):