Re: [PATCH 00/16] Permit filesystem local caching [try #3]

--- David Howells <[email protected]> wrote:

> Casey Schaufler <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > With Smack you can leave the label alone, raise CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE,
> > do your business of setting the label correctly, and then drop
> > the capability. No new hooks required.
> 
> That sounds like a contradiction.  How can you both leave it alone and set
> it?

Whoops, sorry. You leave the process label alone and explicitly
set the file label using the xattr interfaces.


Casey Schaufler
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 00/16] Permit filesystem local caching [try #3]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/16] Permit filesystem local caching [try #3]
    • From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 00/16] Permit filesystem local caching [try #3]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: EHCI Regression in 2.6.23-rc2
• Next by Date: Re: EHCI Regression in 2.6.23-rc2
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Permit filesystem local caching [try #3]
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Permit filesystem local caching [try #3]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]