Re: [PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers.

On Wed, Apr 04, Paul Mackerras wrote:

> David Woodhouse writes:
> 
> > There are proper device numbers registered for pmac_zilog now. Use them.

Which numbers?

> Sigh.  I guess this is inevitable, but IMNSHO this exposes a weakness
> in our serial subsystem.

So, when will the name of pmac_zilog get changed?
What major/minor pair will the two ports get?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers.
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: + serial-turn-serial-console-suspend-a-boot-rather-than-compile-time-option.patch added to -mm tree
• Next by Date: Re: Block device throttling [Re: Distributed storage.]
• Previous by thread: Re: + serial-turn-serial-console-suspend-a-boot-rather-than-compile-time-option.patch added to -mm tree
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]