Re: [PATCH] hres_timers_resume must block interrupts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 19:26 -0400, Joe Korty wrote:
> Retrigger_next_event() must be called with interrupts disabled.
> 
> All internal (to hrtimer.c) uses of retrigger_next_event() are correct.
> But the version exported to other files, hres_timers_resume(), does not
> do the IRQ blocking, nor does the (single) external caller of it.
> 
> Rather than require that users of hres_timers_resume() do the IRQ blocking,
> this patch makes the blocking part of the hres_timers_resume() functionality.

Ack.

> (Also remove the meaningless WARN_ON_ONCE() call in hres_timers_resume)

It's not that meaningless. It catched a resume order problem some time
ago.

	tglx

> Signed-off-by: Joe Korty ([email protected])
> 
> Index: 2.6.23-rc3/kernel/hrtimer.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6.23-rc3.orig/kernel/hrtimer.c	2007-08-13 18:30:09.000000000 -0400
> +++ 2.6.23-rc3/kernel/hrtimer.c	2007-08-13 18:38:48.000000000 -0400
> @@ -463,10 +463,11 @@
>   */
>  void hres_timers_resume(void)
>  {
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(num_online_cpus() > 1);
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	/* Retrigger the CPU local events: */
> +	local_irq_save(flags);
>  	retrigger_next_event(NULL);
> +	local_irq_restore(flags);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux