On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:21:10 +0200, Jan Engelhardt said: > > On Aug 14 2007 00:02, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > > >Better solution is to have multiple MAINTAINERS files distributed in the > >kernel tree, IMHO -- say a drivers/net/MAINTAINERS for maintainer info on > >all various net drivers, drivers/kvm/MAINTAINERS for KVM maintainer info, > >fs/ext3/MAINTAINERS for ext3 maintainers, fs/MAINTAINERS for generic VFS > >maintainers info, so on and so forth. Of course, these individual > >MAINTAINERS files could still have the newly-introduced "F:" fields as > >well (drivers/net/MAINTAINERS would clearly require it, f.e.) ... > > Yes please. > > Or perhaps even putting the maintainer into the Kconfig files? There's large swaths of code that don't have an obvious Kconfig entry but do have a Maintainer entry - VFS, lots of kernel/*, and so on.
Attachment:
pgpi2SZQkoHF9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl
- From: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl
- From: Mariusz Kozlowski <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl
- From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl
- Prev by Date: [-mm patch] kconfig syntax cleanups
- Next by Date: Re: sata drive loosing connection/resetting port
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl
- Index(es):
 |