On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:00:53 +0200
"Kay Sievers" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Kristen Carlson Accardi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Here is an updated set of patches that implement Asynchronous Notification
> > support for ATAPI devices. In this version I no longer export the AN
> > capability through genhd, and the uevent is sent by the scsi_device
> > instead of gendisk. I added a generic SCSI device event mechanism so
> > that it can be expanded in the future with other types of events. Please
> > let me know what you think.
> Does that mean:
> will go away?
Yes - this method was rejected by James, so I had to change away from
using the genhd to transmit events.
> Then we will need to come up with an idea to propagate that to the
> blockdev, it gets a bit nasty for userspace to find out which
> blockdevice it should update. It's certainly possible, but just not as
> easy as it is now, because userspace just doesn't really care in most
> cases what kind of bus device a block device is coming from.
Is it possible to use the linkage that is in the scsi_device directory
of the disk that is sending the event to find the relevant block devices?
For example, /sys/class/scsi_device/0:0:0:0/device/block:sda
on my system tells me which block devices belong to this device.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]