> > It would be nice to know why - is the cable detet coming out right on
> > this ?
>
> The box has a short 40-wire cable, so pata_artop drops to udma/33
> while aec62xx does udma/100 without intervention. I added an override
Curious as both use the same cable detect logic.
> to artop6260_cable_detect() to make it return PATA40_SHORT on this
> platform, and with that it does udma/100 as expected.
Patch would be good. Looks like there are a couple of cases anyway where
artop needs platform specific uglies
>
> Read performance fluctuates quite a bit, but seems to be 1-3 MB/s
> slower than aec62xx on average. I compared lspci -vvxxx and the
> only differences are a latency setting and some ROM thingy:
Latency shouldn't matter but you can tweak the driver to verify easily
enough
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
