Re: [PATCH 4 of 5 ] /drivers/char/rio ioremap balancing/ returncode check

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:42:35 -0400 Alan Cox 
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Your mail client has wrapped the patches. Please resend without 
>wrapping

Much as I'd love to blame my mail client for this one...

Patch 4 of the 5 I sent was the only one with wrapping, and that 
wrapping existed in abundance in /drivers/char/rio/rio_linux.c file 
long before I got there.  Several lines in that file exceed 100 
columns, I think the "winner" was around 142.

I think tackling all the wordwrap issues would belong in a 
different patch as I'm just trying to clean up ioremap usage.  And, 
yes, I contributed *one more* wordwrap issue to the file, but when 
in Rome...

---------------------------------------
Scott Thompson / [email protected]
---------------------------------------



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 4 of 5 ] /drivers/char/rio ioremap balancing/ returncode check
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on arm
• Next by Date: [kj] is_power_of_2 in drivers/block/rd.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4 of 5 ] /drivers/char/rio ioremap balancing/ returncode check
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 4 of 5 ] /drivers/char/rio ioremap balancing/ returncode check
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]