On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:25 -0700, joe@perches.com wrote: > Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 1c014f1..5144e4e 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ L: samba-technical@lists.samba.org > W: http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html > T: git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfrench/cifs-2.6.git > S: Supported > +F: fs/cifs/ No comment on the F:, but the L: entry here is interesting. Is samba-technical really the right list for cifs-vfs patches? Aside from being CC'ed on such patches, I've never seen discussion of them on the Samba mailing lists. Steve: Shouldn't that be linux-cifs-client? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)
- From: "Steve French" <smfrench@gmail.com>
- Re: [PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)
- References:
- [PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)
- From: joe@perches.com
- [PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 11/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m32r
- Next by Date: [PATCH 12/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m68knommu
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)
- Index(es):
 |