Re: [patch 1/2] spinlock: lockbreak cleanup

On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 02:07:43AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> Nick,
> 
> These two patches make my P4 (single socket HT) test box not boot. I dropped them for now.
> 
> Some oopses

Sorry, the trylock had a race where it would not work correctly :(
Have fixed it now and will do more testing and resend to you.

Thanks,
Nick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 1/2] spinlock: lockbreak cleanup
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/2] spinlock: lockbreak cleanup
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFD] Layering: Use-Case Composers (was: DRBD - what is it, anyways? [compare with e.g. NBD + MD raid])
• Next by Date: RE: [PATCH] [470/2many] MAINTAINERS - TCP LOW PRIORITY MODULE
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/2] spinlock: lockbreak cleanup
• Next by thread: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/ips.c: fix scsi_add_host warning
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]