On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > This does make me wonder, why these weren't caught in -mm ? > > I'm worried that -mm isn't getting a lot of exposure these days. People do > run it, but I wonder how many.. andrew caught it in -mm and reverted it. it crashed his vaio. -dean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] [0/12] x86 Late merge bug fixes for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [1/12] x86: Work around mmio config space quirk on AMD Fam10h
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [1/12] x86: Work around mmio config space quirk on AMD Fam10h
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [1/12] x86: Work around mmio config space quirk on AMD Fam10h
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [1/12] x86: Work around mmio config space quirk on AMD Fam10h
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [1/12] x86: Work around mmio config space quirk on AMD Fam10h
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [1/12] x86: Work around mmio config space quirk on AMD Fam10h
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [0/12] x86 Late merge bug fixes for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: [PATCH ] /drivers/atm ioremap balancing/ returncode check
- Next by Date: [PATCH 1 of 5 ] /drivers/char ioremap balancing/ returncode check
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [1/12] x86: Work around mmio config space quirk on AMD Fam10h
- Next by thread: [PATCH] [3/12] x86_64: Don't mark __exitcall as __cold
- Index(es):
 |