> 2) Do close reader fd, but what results can then applications
> reliably expect? What would be the sane intention of applications
> closing reader fd? Do programmers expect all of the current results?
> Fredrik
Since there's no atomic "unlock and read" function, any code that could ever
close a socket in one thread while another thread is blocked on read might
call close just before another thread blocks in read. Nothing stops another
thread from opening something, getting the same file descriptor, and then
allowing the thread to call "read" on the wrong file descriptor entirely.
Since this can never be made sane in general, I see little point in making
one variation of what can go wrong a bit saner. It is still irresponsible to
code like this.
DS
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
