Re: [PATCH 3/4] signalfd: fix interaction with posix-timers

[Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>]

This only affects signalfd and so the core change seems ok vs status quo.

I think it would be better overall not to have anyone like signalfd calling
dequeue_signal in its current form at all.  (The function is too much an
internal piece of the core signals code.  The SIGNAL_STOP_DEQUEUED code
applying for signalfd calls is probably another problem, for example.)


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/