--- Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >+static int smack_task_movememory(struct task_struct *p)
> >> >+{
> >> >+ int rc;
> >> >+
> >> >+ rc = smk_curacc(smk_of_task(p), MAY_WRITE);
> >> >+ return rc;
> >> >+}
> >>
> >> Uh...
> >>
> >> {
> >> return smk_curacc(smk_of_task(p), MAY_WRITE);
> >> }
> >>
> >> (also others)
> >
> >That was a little excessive, wasn't it?
>
> How do you mean? I was just suggesting to collapse the three [four] lines
> into
> one, getting rid of the tempotemporaries in a lot of these functions,
> for example,
Sorry, I meant that my code was excessive, not your comment.
Your comment was fine and most welcome. I'm sorry that I was
unclear and sounded defensive.
Casey Schaufler
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
