Am Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:00:15 +0200
schrieb Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>:
> My goal is *not* to do all the hard work they do, but just to backport
> from their patches those which are meaningful for 2.6.20. For this
> reason, 2.6.20 releases will always be slightly late and should not
> contain patches not merged in more recent releases.
>
> My intent with this version is to catch up with 2.6.21.7. Other
> patches are already pending for future releases, but one thing at a
> time. I'm trying to follow the same review/release process, so 28
> patches will be posted for review in response to this message.
hm. i'm a bit confused about your intention.
will you keep maintaining 2.6.20.x for longer? should this one replace
or live along the 2.6.16.xx long life series?
Andreas Radke
ArchLinux x86_64 developer/maintainer
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
