On 12 Aug 2007 15:55:50 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Ok Linus already applied your patch. Even though it's a really bad
> > > fragile hack, not better than the old bug.
> > > Petr are you double sure you really tested with
> > > ab144f5ec64c42218a555ec1dbde6b60cf2982d6
> > > already applied? I bet not -- it is the symptom exactly fixed by this patch
> >
> > I'm quite sure that this patch is in my tree, as I have that "u8
> > *instr = a->instr;" in apply_alternatives, and it seems that this one
> > was added by checkin you mention... My tree was synced up to:
>
> Can you double check? I have a hard time believing it.
I've seen the reboot too, with "rc2-g3864e8cc" that is newer than
ab144f5ec64c4:
$ git-log ab144f5ec64c4..| grep 3864e8cc
commit 3864e8ccbba1dcdea87398ab80fdc8ae0fab7c45
--
Paolo Ornati
Linux 2.6.23-rc2-gac078602 on x86_64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]