On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >> Shouldn't we just not stop vm accounting for kernel threads?
> >>
> >
> > Could be. It'd help heaps if we knew which patch in -mm caused
> > this, but from a quick peek it seems to me that mainline should be
> > vulnerable as well.
>
> Thats a valid point. It would be interesting to see what the overcommit
> setting was, when the panic occurred.
FYI, I do have nondefault overcommit settings:
vm.overcommit_memory = 2
vm.lowmem_reserve_ratio = 1 1
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]