On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 01:55:07PM +0200, Unai Uribarri ([email protected]) wrote: > > This breaks compatibility. Add new socket option, which will really > > disable it and do all your logic, but not breaking existing > > applications. > > > > Is SO_TIMESTAMP2 a valid name? I can't imagine how to call it. :) what about name, which really shows what option does? -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: don't enable timestamps in mmap'ed sockets
- From: Unai Uribarri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: don't enable timestamps in mmap'ed sockets
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: don't enable timestamps in mmap'ed sockets
- From: Unai Uribarri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: don't enable timestamps in mmap'ed sockets
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: don't enable timestamps in mmap'ed sockets
- From: Unai Uribarri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: don't enable timestamps in mmap'ed sockets
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: don't enable timestamps in mmap'ed sockets
- From: Unai Uribarri <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: don't enable timestamps in mmap'ed sockets
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix OOPS in show_uevent()
- Next by Date: Partition information lost on reboot.
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: don't enable timestamps in mmap'ed sockets
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: don't enable timestamps in mmap'ed sockets
- Index(es):
 |