Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's security ID to be obtained [try #2]

Casey Schaufler <[email protected]> wrote:

> Grumble. Yet another thing to undo in the near future. I still
> hope to suggest what I would consider a viable alternative "soon".

Use a struct key with the overrides attached?  The key can be generated by
SELinux or whatever module is there.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's security ID to be obtained [try #2]
  - From: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Softlockup detected with 2.6.23-rc2-mm1
Next by Date: Re: + sysctl-error-on-bad-sysctl-tables.patch added to -mm tree
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's security ID to be obtained [try #2]
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's security ID to be obtained [try #2]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]