On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:48:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:15:53AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Vignaud wrote:
> > ...
> > > I was still testing on -rc2:
> > > Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend
> > > Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +0200
> > >
> > > For me after 1day 20hours, the network is still up, with more than
> > > 1To of network traffic. HZ was 1000, i restart with HZ=100.
> >
> > For me it's enough too but Thomas seems to doubt.
>
> seem to doubt what? That rc2 fixes the symptom? That is a sure thing,
> and we never doubted that. I think you might have misunderstood what
> Thomas said and meant, so please just state your opinion unambiguously
> so that we can fix any mis-communication :)
>
> Ingo
>
On 25-07-2007 02:19, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
...
> Actually we only need the resend for edge type interrupts. Level type
> interrupts come back once enable_irq() re-enables the interrupt line.
>
On 10-08-2007 10:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
...
> But suppressing the resend is not fixing the driver problem. The problem
> can show up with spurious interrupts and with interrupts on a shared PCI
> interrupt line at any time. It just might take weeks instead of minutes.
Maybe I miss something but it's not the same!
So, should Jean-Baptiste or Marcin test this for weeks or it's enough?
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
