Re: [patch (testing)] Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after random time

> For me it's enough too but Thomas seems to doubt.
> 
> You've written earlier that you've 2.6.23-rc1 with HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
> prepared too. So, if this is not a great problem maybe you could try
> this first. Tomorrow Thomas may send something, so this 100HZ could
> wait yet, I hope?

Ok, i'll test 2.6.23-rc1 with HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND first.

Jb

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on alpha
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] obsolete fragment from ext4
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch (testing)] Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after random time
• Next by thread: Re: + sysctl-remove-binary-sysctl-support-where-it-clearly-doesnt-work.patch added to -mm tree
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]