On 8/9/07, Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote: > The allocations problems that this patch addresses can be fixed by making reclaim > more intelligent. If you believe that the deadlock problems we address here can be better fixed by making reclaim more intelligent then please post a patch and we will test it. I am highly skeptical, but the proof is in the patch. > If we can reclaim in an emergency even in ATOMIC contexts then things get much > easier. It is already easy, and it is already fixed in this patch series. Sure, we can pare these patches down a little more, but you are going to have a really hard time coming up with something simpler that actually works. Regards, Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
- References:
- [PATCH 00/10] foundations for reserve-based allocation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
- From: Daniel Phillips <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
- From: "Daniel Phillips" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
- From: "Daniel Phillips" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
- From: "Daniel Phillips" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/10] foundations for reserve-based allocation
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] obsolete fragment from ext4
- Next by Date: mlock() is working?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
- Index(es):