Re: [PATCH 04/10] sysctl: Fix neighbour table sysctls.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[email protected]> writes:

> In article <[email protected]> (at Thu, 09 Aug 2007
> 20:23:16 -0600), [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman) says:
>
>> YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[email protected]> writes:
>> 
>> > Would you explain why it does not work properly
>> > for those cases?
>> 
>> Mostly no appropriate strategy routine was setup to 
>> report the data to the caller of sys_sysctl.
>
> I assume that default strategy have been existing for it, no?!
> Maybe, I do miss something...

I'd have to go through it case by case.  But in general
unless your proc_handler is proc_dointvec the default
strategy routine which does a raw binary copy of your data
out will generally do the wrong thing.

So especially if your data is jiffies or otherwise needs
processing you don't want to use the default strategy
routine.

Until relatively recently no one was really policing the
sysctl interfaces and even now it isn't too serious.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux