Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]> writes:
> I found why first version should be rejected, and, no, it is not
> documentation updates. Here is version 2:
I care about the documentation because it is the best thing
we have for enforcing sane sysctl table usage.
After looking at the problem. While I can't remove ctl_name
from the sysctl tables easily. What I can do is check at
registration time if a sysctl table is sane, and print
an error message and fail to register that table if it has problems.
Once that is in place I will have no problems killing CTL_UNNUMBERED.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
