Re: [PATCH 17/23] mm: count writeback pages per BDI

On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Less conditionals. We already have a branch for mapping, why create
> another?

Ah. Okay. This also avoids an interrupt enable disable since you can use 
__ functions. Hmmm... Would be good if we could move the vmstat 
NR_WRITEBACK update there too. Can a page without a mapping be under 
writeback? (Direct I/O?)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 17/23] mm: count writeback pages per BDI
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 17/23] mm: count writeback pages per BDI
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 17/23] mm: count writeback pages per BDI
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 17/23] mm: count writeback pages per BDI
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 14/14] NFS: Use local caching [try #2]
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc2-mm1
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 17/23] mm: count writeback pages per BDI
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 17/23] mm: count writeback pages per BDI
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]