Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's security ID to be obtained [try #2]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, David Howells wrote:

> James Morris <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > > +	u32 (*inode_get_secid)(struct inode *inode);
> > 
> > To maintain API consistency, please return an int which only acts as an 
> > error code, and returning the secid via a *u32 function parameter.
> 
> Does that apply to *all* the functions, irrespective of whether or not they
> return an error?

LSM is theoretically an API, so we generally don't know if a security 
module will return an error or not.

If they were simply calls directly into SElinux, where we could always 
know the semantics, then that would be a different story.



- James
-- 
James Morris
<[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux