Re: [PATCH 09/14] CacheFiles: Permit a process's create SID to be overridden [try #2]

Casey Schaufler <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is SELinux specific funtionality and should be done in the
> SELinux code. You should not be adding interfaces that are SELinux
> specific, in this case using secids instead of the LSM blob interfaces.

Is using secids your only objection?  Or are you objecting to the whole
'act-as' concept?

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 09/14] CacheFiles: Permit a process's create SID to be overridden [try #2]
    • From: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 09/14] CacheFiles: Permit a process's create SID to be overridden [try #2]
    • From: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: why are some atomic_t's not volatile, while most are?
• Next by Date: Re: why are some atomic_t's not volatile, while most are?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 09/14] CacheFiles: Permit a process's create SID to be overridden [try #2]
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 09/14] CacheFiles: Permit a process's create SID to be overridden [try #2]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]