Re: [PATCH 16/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on s390

On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 10:06 -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
> From: Chris Snook <[email protected]>
> 
> Make atomic[64]_read() volatile on s390, to ensure memory is actually read
> each time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Snook <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 16/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on s390
    • From: Chris Snook <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on alpha
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: don't enable timestamps in mmap'ed sockets
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 16/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on s390
• Next by thread: [PATCH 17/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on sh64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]