Re: Documentation files in html format?

Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 12:31 schrieb Stephen Hemminger:
> Since the network device documentation needs a rewrite, I was thinking
> of using basic html format instead of just plain text. 

Why don't you simply use DocBook? Then the user has the choice to convert
to HTML, PDF, LaTex or whatever.

Thanks,
Hans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Documentation files in html format?
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Documentation files in html format?
    • From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Documentation files in html format?
    • From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] [0/12] x86 Late merge bug fixes for 2.6.23
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [4/12] x86_64: Disable CLFLUSH support again
• Previous by thread: Re: Documentation files in html format?
• Next by thread: Re: Documentation files in html format?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]