Re:[patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend

> Hi,
> 
> I see there is a bit of complaining on this original resend temporary
> patch. But, since it seems to do a good job for some people, here is
> my proposal to limit the 'range of fire' a little bit.
> 
> Marcin and Jean-Baptiste: try to test this with 2.6.23-rc2, please.
> (Unless Ingo or Thomas have other plans with this problem?)

2.6.23-rc2 + this patch, and the box's cards are still networking after 20 hours.

RX bytes:452423991847 (421.3 GiB)  TX bytes:13464471620 (12.5 GiB)

still testing.

Jb


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Prev by Date: Re: Question: RT schedular : task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) : decreases overhead when rq->nr_running == 1
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] make atomic_t volatile on all architectures
• Previous by thread: usb device module probing
• Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64 EFI boot support: EFI frame buffer driver
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]