On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote: > I think in general irq context reclaim is doable. Cannot see obvious > issues on a first superficial pass through rmap.c. The irq holdoff would > be pretty long though which may make it unacceptable. The IRQ holdoff could be tremendous. But if it is sufficiently infrequent and if the worst effect is merely a network rx ring overflow then the tradeoff might be a good one. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: slub: add knowledge of reserve pages
- From: "Daniel Phillips" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: slub: add knowledge of reserve pages
- References:
- [PATCH 00/10] foundations for reserve-based allocation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 04/10] mm: slub: add knowledge of reserve pages
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: slub: add knowledge of reserve pages
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: slub: add knowledge of reserve pages
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: slub: add knowledge of reserve pages
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: slub: add knowledge of reserve pages
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: slub: add knowledge of reserve pages
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/10] foundations for reserve-based allocation
- Prev by Date: Re: [Patch 05/18] fs/logfs/dir.c
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC 04/10] Temporary struct vfs_lookup in file_permission
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: slub: add knowledge of reserve pages
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: slub: add knowledge of reserve pages
- Index(es):
 |