On Wed, 8 August 2007 20:07:34 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 18:16 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > +static inline void logfs_inc_count(struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > + inode->i_nlink++;
> > + mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void logfs_dec_count(struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > + inode->i_nlink--;
> > + mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode);
> > +}
> include/linux/fs.h: inode_inc_link_count() inode_dec_link_count() do
> this. Although not sure they exist in the old kernel your patches are
> against.
Almost, they call mark_inode_dirty() instead of mark_inode_dirty_sync().
I wonder if that's necessary.
Jörn
--
Measure. Don't tune for speed until you've measured, and even then
don't unless one part of the code overwhelms the rest.
-- Rob Pike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
