On Wednesday 08 August 2007 17:11:54 huang ying wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Instead, elilo collects the needed information
> > > defined in include/asm-x86_64/bootsetup.h itself,
> >
> > That's nasty. I must have missed when we declared this a public ABI.
> > It's not really designed to be one. Was there public discussion on this?
>
> Maybe What I said is not clear and correct. In fact, the elilo follows
> the boot protocol defined in Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt,
No that's not the boot protocol. The boot protocol is in Documentation/i386/boot.txt
> just
> not uses arch/(i386|x86_64)/boot/setup.S to collect the information,
> but collects them by elilo itself. Information in
> include/asm-x86_64/bootsetup.h is just a part of that in
> Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt.
That's an internal interface that is not really suitable to use
by other programs. e.g. it is not extensible (unlike the boot protocol)
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
