RE: Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64

Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> After some time away from it, and a big rebase as a consequence, here
is
> the updated version of paravirt_ops for x86_64, heading to inclusion.
> 
> Your criticism is of course, very welcome.
> 
> Have fun

Do you assume that the kernel ougtht to use 2MB pages for its mappings
(e.g. initilal text/data,  direct mapping of physical memory) under your
paravirt_ops?  As far as I look at the patches, I don't find one. 

Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
    • From: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Serial buffer memory leak
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 18/25] [PATCH] turn priviled operations into macros in entry.S
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/25] [PATCH] irq_flags / halt routines
• Next by thread: Re: Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]