On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 02:45:32PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I'm not familiar enough with the tty code to decide what the proper fix should
> > be. I'll try to write a patch if someone could point me in the right
> > direction.
>
> Something like this perhaps ?
>
[....]
> - * flush all the buffers containing receive data
> + * flush all the buffers containing receive data. Caller must
> + * hold the buffer lock and must have ensured no parallel flush to
> + * ldisc is running.
> *
> * Locking: none
^^^^
> */
Isn't the comment a bit misleading here? The caller must hold tty->buf.lock.
Frederik
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
