Re: PAT support for i386 and x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I don't see why we have to worry about cache corruption in the case at
> hand. Write-combining is needed to map io (typically pci-mem regions)
> which are never mapped cachable anywhere, including in the linear map.

If we WC them using PAT then there would be a UC<->WC conflict with
the direct mapping and possibly others. That's already undefined
and not allowed.

After some very bad experiences in the past I'm not going to take
chances on this.

We really need to keep all possible mappings synchronized.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux