Hello Eric,
> How bad is it if you just run with irqpoll in the kdump kernel?
> If running with irqpoll is usable that is probably preferable
> to putting in a hardware work around we can survive without.
Yes, I tried that. No effect.
> Have you done any looking at moving where the kernel initalizes
> io_apics? One of the todo items on the path is to leave
> io_apic mode enabled and just startup the kernel in io_apic
> mode.
I have tried to recover from the "IRR set" situation in several ways by
changing setup_IO_APIC_irq(). But I haven't found a way to recover from
this situation once disable_IO_APIC() had been called.
I concluded thatthe sequence of events
"send INT message - never receive EOI - disable IO-APIC pin"
messes up the IO-APIC (at least this specific one in the
PCIEx-PCI bridge of the ICH7).
The current state of affairs is that the only thing that "worked" was to
re-enable irqs.
> When doing that a version of your work around (if needed)
> would certainly be reasonable.
> My general concern is that the trickier we get in the code
> running in the crashed kernel the less reliable the entire
> process will be.
That's certainly correct. I am grateful for all hints that simplify my patch.
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Wilck
PRIMERGY System Software Engineer
FSC IP ESP DE6
Fujitsu Siemens Computers GmbH
Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1
33106 Paderborn
Germany
Tel: ++49 5251 8 15113
Fax: ++49 5251 8 20409
Email: mailto:[email protected]
Internet: http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com
Company Details: http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/imprint.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]