Re: [PATCH] msleep() with hrtimers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> I'd be surprised if there was significant overhead - the maximum frequency
> at which msleep() can be called is 1000Hz.  We'd need an awful lot of
> overhead for that to cause problems, surely?
> <thinks he's missing something again>

_Anybody_ has yet to answer what's wrong with adding a nanosleep() and 
using that instead.

bye, Roman
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux